Articles
Do Not Mistake What Some Mean by Tolerance
Do Not Mistake What Some Mean by Tolerance
Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian declared war on establishments which wished to decline services to those of the LGBT community. Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes bakery, were driven out of business by a lawsuit in the wake of their refusal to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. According to Todd Starnes,
They faced boycotts and picket lines and other wedding vendors were threatened with similar action if they did business with Sweet Cakes. The family's young children received death threats and the store’s social networking platforms were overrun by militant LGBT activists posting obscene and profane messages.
On top of that, they were ordered by the court to pay the couple $135,000 in emotional damages.
The Kleins refused on the grounds that it violated their "deeply-held religious beliefs.” Anyone familiar with the Bible could understand the roots of their conviction, even if those ones don't agree with the Bible (Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11; 1 Timothy 1:8-11). Unfortunately for the Kleins, "tolerance" was not extended to them. Freedom of religion did not cover their attempt to freely practice their religion in their daily lives.
We have seen forces within our country, in politics, education, the media, and the like, pushing a moral agenda that is often cloaked under the guise of creating tolerance for absolutely everyone. But such is a logical impossibility. For those who see the Bible as their unalterable, unchanging guide, there are moral, ethical, and doctrinal absolutes. Nothing, be it culture, situations, or moral shifts, can alter and change God's commands. In other words, killing the unborn does not become morally acceptable just because our nation passed a law. We do not want our money to fund what we deem sinful. Fornication, adultery, homosexuality, and any other sexual relationship the Bible identifies as sinful does not cease to be so just because the culture embraces it. We don't want to be forced to accept what we believe, from Scripture, to be unacceptable to God. Yet, the very articulation of such conviction is increasingly rejected. That seat at the table of civil discourse has been removed and stuck in the corner (if not thrown into the yard).
For some, tolerance has come to mean acceptance of their world view and philosophy. It is not extended to those who disagree or who advocate a divergent point of view (isn't that what tolerance means?). But, such is inevitable. There is no such thing as absolute tolerance. Immorality and morality, biblically defined, cannot peacefully coexist. Paul says, "Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm" (Ephesians 6:11-13). It is a struggle against powers and forces. It requires a firm stand and a resistance. Not a physical, literal fight (2 Corinthians 10:3-5). It's a battle of the mind. It depends on the rank and file of people having properly trained, sharpened consciences, formed and spurred by God's truth as revealed in Scripture.
Jesus says this is to be expected (John 15:19). Peter (1 Peter 4:12) and John (1 John 3:13) echo it. Our task is to find the honest hearts and minds (Luke 8:15) who are seeking truth amid the cacophony of cultural noise. And, no matter what it costs us, hold onto truth and teach it to our children (Deuteronomy 6:1ff) which every way the cultural wind blows. Jesus did not call us to be tolerant (Revelation 2:2,20), but rather teachers of truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). May we never lose sight of that.
